Good day! We're demoing InsiteVR today and I find myself using the Panorama output in Enscape for the first time. I'm using a high quality output, but that doesn't seem like high enough quality to be worthwhile. I've attached a series of comparison images. Even at high quality the Panorama doesn't look great compared to InsiteVR, but when you compare the standard image output side by side, Enscape is the very clear winner. We love Enscape and use it for our standard image output, but we can't incorporate Enscape 360 panoramas in our VR demos at the moment. Is this a setting I'm overlooking, an issue with InsiteVR or just a current limitation of panorama quality? Perhaps VR180 is an option, maintaining the same resolution, so we are effectively doubling the clarity?
Anyways, I love the new updates. Complex models load a lot faster and the lighting improvements are awesome. Still need to work with the new materials editor, but thank you as always for the awesomeness that is Enscape.