Posts by EGIE
-
-
... It doesn't matter to me at all how you did all that!!!! I just want to know: When can you deliver and install this kitchen here at my place?
Prima !!!
-
they said in 2.6 will improve quality of the shadows so we will se in which range from camera it will be true .....
i mean that shadows degradation based on distance must be really NOT noticable .....
yes ! and frankly and only as far as it concerns me: I don't care about all this VR stuff as long as at least the sills will have a top quality !! so I hope for the best 
-
... again I just want to underline the urgency and necessity of an improvement here with this current work example. All Nvidia drivers are freshly updated and I'm working with the latest Enscape version. It is unquestionable that these unchanged so bad shadow results are absolutely unacceptable...
(so very frustrating as well since i have never received any usable result so far) I always wonder why Enscape can render materials so well but this banality of a shadow calculation doesn´t seem to be possible -
Prima !! What a really accomplished and wonderful job
the more that this work becomes part of a superordinate intention and remains not only as a nice picture! Congratulations This product fly Over web thing is great !!! -
Hi Michael Ruehr, thanks for your objection which is completely correct
(I had mistakenly assumed Revit contains these settings by default).
So I remain at least in the hope that Enscape will improve the view(-port) connectivity where the main CAD applications already determine these settings
By the way - your iso overview above is great -
yes, all this would be great options , but: All this would be possible out of the box, if Enscape would be able to map 1 to 1 what our main cad application is pretending. Of course, this also includes the 2-point perspective: Here also: Not the Enscape-own version, but of course only the one that our CAD application already supplies. So enscape itself does not have to be able to do that alone, because our CAD can do all that already and better. Enscape should render it only
-
... Your contrast range of albedo is correct and therefore, it feels very natural!
yes, an excellent work indeed !
@Thomas Schander, what do you mean with "contrast range of albedo"? -
really a class of its own
-
Myself, no, better we work in a big team too. So it must always be ensured that everyone is able to take on any work arising, even from colleagues. So we always store project files on central server drives - not least because we are spread over many locations (and different countries even). Of course there is also the specification that we must copy the used preset files next to the corresponding SkUp files.
To ensure that colleagues are able to handle any Enscape tasks, I have introduced the specification that ALWAYS must be named the used Render Output Resolution (even if this doesn't really work with Enscape since we are not able to synchronize our views 100% identical across different workstations), the used Solar North Angle and the used Enscape preset in the corresponding SkUp scene´s naming.
This somewhat old-fashioned and analog looking approach has proven to be very practical for us, since you don't have to look for any further documentations elsewhere. Something like shown below - maybe it will be good for you, too, at least until there is another and better solution ... -
... For 2.6, we're currently working on a major improvement on the sun shadow quality, it will be in one of the next public previews.
great & and good news !! I can hardly wait - I didn´t have released a single project so far because of this shadow deficit... -
... many thanks for this details daomn - very very good !
-
I've done this way:...
a great (and actually so obvious ) suggestion which I will keep in mind for the next opportunity - thank you! -
yes, nice renders and views Indeed
@Pablo Correa - "these images are rendered using sketchup section activated" - what you mean here is that you can create those "theater-stage"-views this way instead of looking for any "real" in-model camera location? The black darkening of the cuted edges you made in postpro later?
-
thanks - I often do it in the same way - at least with these projects that are worth it to me but setting up the ridge-tiles(?) is a pain always then
-
Wunderbar !!!
an overwhelmingly beautiful work
You have modeled these great looking roof tiles rows really three-dimensional? -
.... Beer taps not connected yet. I did try...
and in total 3 more stage Beer taps !!! what a wonderful place! ( not only because of the beer ) -
...and...
more WALKING people!!!
most of them are standing or doing something WITHOUT moving... (moving legs, walking...). it is not easy to make simple "street"...... including also some stairs up and down walking persons also ...
-
Prima!
!!!
a really great job and finally an extraordinarily extensive and very helpful "process documentation" in the form of your tutorials - also for these 1000 x thanks!
(btw - Is the house still available?) -
nothing extraordinary really
inspired by a video from TheSketchUpEssentials, I just installed and played around for the first time with TIG´s great "Slicer" plugin and I have no idea why I let myself so much time to discover this great tool which is so much fun to work with (next to Fredo6´s Curviloft and JointPushPull plugins)
https://sketchucation.com/plug…nKZ-OVOdBZUPIJzMCHfs9JsU8
