Yes, this is a known shortcoming. It has nothing to do with the color, it may be more visible on some than others. We will try to improve that in the future.
Posts by Thomas Willberger
-
-
Great results! Happy to hear that you like the light transport in Enscape. The "only" thing you have to keep in mind is to avoid overly saturated, dark or bright materials which do not exist in reality. You did this quite right which results in immediate realistic results.
-
Great! Are the vegetation object from the asset library?
-
Wow great image! Very good material setup.
-
Various Revit procedural textures are not supported. Use a normal map instead. ljohnson I would not recommend using a water material for anything that's not water.
The view dependant color shift that you like to have (like in soap bubbles) is not supported in Enscape right now.
-
Great image!
Also there is still a bug with the line light, it shows three distinct spots at ends and center... so not a line so much. Wondering if it happened to anyone as well.
We fixed that, will be released in 2.7 and probably in one of the upcoming previews.
-
Given the complexity, the fraction of users who have a dual GPU setup and the potential gain: It's probably not going to happen. We will continue to make Enscape faster for all users.
-
And I still think that having a numerical distance rather than a percentage would be an improvement.
This is already the case. The amount (Circle of confusion scale) is in percentage, the distance is in meters once you enable manual focus.
-
Awesome! It's great to see the buildings interieur at sunset. Well done!
-
The "drop-off" between sharp and blurred follows the same 'curve' as the DOF amount:
- The more you have in focus, the slower the drop-off to blurred.
- The less you have in focus, the quicker the drop-off to blurred.
What I (we?) would like to be able to have is a 'near' and 'far' DOF (with a measurable "distance from camera" setting): everything between these is sharp and the drop-off follows the same "amount" curve as we have just now.
As I said, I understood what you want - this is currently not implemented in Enscape. I just tried to explain the current implementation and the posted equation.
-
I just said that the DOF parameter should define an interval between two planes,
That's the DOF amount in Enscape right now. The planes are symmetric around the focal plane.
The positioning of the center between the two planes should be either defined by the user
That's the manual focus, which is indicated as a white range at the focal center.
-
Yes. We are already aware of that but haven't done it yet for technical reasons. But this may change in the future.
-
...Herbo: that's EXACTLY how a camera works! That is why it's unsettling to have a different behaviour for the rendering!
Attached abstract from "View Camera Technique" by Leslie Stroebel.
I understand your request, we will discuss that. But your interpretation of the equations is wrong. Just because there are two planes of equal CoC (circle of confusion) in front and behind the focal plane does not mean that they are independent from each other. In fact, they are not. The camera parameters boil down to one degree of freedom that controls the CoC w.r.t the focal plane.
But anyway, I understand the request. Sometimes it might be useful to bend the laws of physics for artistic freedom. We will discuss that.
-
i wonde why the sun has volumetric effect and reflectors not .....
It's an Enscape limitation. Currently only fog for sun light.
-
It looks great! Very nice material setup and composition. To the point!
-
Awesome vegetation. Great work!
You selected Revit as your tool for this thread? Must be Sketchup, right?
-
Looks nice yet I think it would look even better if some colors wouldn't be as saturated as they are. Remember that Enscape expects you to use prober PBR albedos.
-
Stunning results!
Certainly a hall of fame candidate. -
-
Great that you found a solution. One thing to consider is the white balance / color temperature of the image. This also causes a slight color distortion (also in photography). There are a few settings exposed on that matter.