You know...you might be able to fake the look of SSS in Enscape. See attachment. I noticed a couple things: You can't have self-illumination and transparency on at the same time, and bump map doesn't seem to show.
Sidenote and reminder: could be great if the team could make that parameters can be free combined and still work. It would be a big step forward.
arqcova Maybe the artefacts are caused by the low polygon quality and they are reflections at some bad mesh faces. But an other issue for me would be the visible noise. Are this screenshots of the Enscape window only or are this final renderings?
Impressive mood and quality!!!
Sean Farrell Thank, this helps. An other question - could it be possible to set an non system graphic card for Enscape use?
For example I think about to use two RTX2080ti (NVlink - 22GB) for Vray rendering and a GTX1080ti 11GB for display use. It could be great to use the RTX cards for Enscape too.
Sean Farrell So, if I would buy two RTX cards and connect them, than Enscape will work? I don't need to remove the link, but I don't will have the doubled GPU power, right?
I got an idea now and disabled VfR from the plugin list and ... all materials are like they should be. So, Vray cause material trouble at Enscape. Now I will ask at the right team to solve the problem. 
Demian Gutberlet Pete Chamberlain I got no answer at the McNeel side yet but it seems to be a serious problem.
One year before I created a scene at Rhino 6. Today I opened to check it and I found, some materials got the "plugin" flag enabled at the object properties and are not connected to the material at the Rhino material editor anymore. A dark reflective plastic is a non reflective pink now. It looks like there is a problem with the plugin ID, old scenes setups are destroyed. I will send a file per email to Demian.
Looks like a RT SSS effect could be possible, here an example from Eevee:
https://cgcookie.com/articles/…ns-of-real-time-rendering
Is Eevee Open Source? Maybe it's possible to use some code for Enscape.
BarryFishFinger Since Enscape doesn't support multi GPU usage you could try to get so much GPU power and memory as possible.
At the web I found the GTX2080ti is 35% faster. Here a wild calculation:
RTX2080 cost 820€ x 1.35 -> 1100,-€. So, the price/perfomance difference between RTX2080 and RTX2080ti (1200€) is approx. 100€. For 100€ you get 11GB instead 8GB. If you want to keep the GPU for 4 years the GTX2080ti could be a good deal.
Also it depends on your need - if you like to use a HMD, than GPU power can't be enough. If you like to create complex scenes and to work with other software like Photoshop ... at the same time, than a higher GPU memory could be useful too.
CPU speed - for what do you need it? Is the speed so important?
RAM - 32GB is not so much, but it depends on your need. Best you look at your current RAM usage. You could buy 32GB now, but keep some slots open to upgrade later.
Great scene, herbo!
Just to clarify: We already do ray tracing in Enscape. RTX will first of all accelerate it - but real time raytracing is already in there! We might however add a bit more detail and realism to the reflections with RTX.
But at the RTX architecture example posted last there was a lot more reflection details visible, there was a big quality jump. For example at the 7th images (view9) here there is a bright distracting wrong reflection at the left front wheel and I hope per RTX this effect will be gone. Will it not?
Concrete idea: instead no shadow for custom skyboxes there is a diameter option needed, per default it could be set for example at 1000m.
And now we need a solution and shouldn't stop here until the next user post the problem. Please.
I had the problem that at turns the speed was to high. If my camera fly around a corner, the speed was much to fast, I missed an option like degree per second.
IES for Rhino please. IES looks so much better and it would allow to get something like a cone angle control that is missed at the spot lights. Enscape has so much limits to work around so it could be nice if all core features would be working at least, without the users needs to beg for it.
I would try to workaround with an emitter material for the under water pool sides, something like faked baked textures.
Did you tried to lower the metallic slider? So you should be able to get more plastic and less metal particles in your virtual paint. At the moment your car paint looks like a full metal only.
Pano2VR could do it.
Great video, we can see some flicker in it, hope the development team can fix these flicker soon
Oh yes, could be great if the team would render some test videos and fix all small quality issues. Final clients are so nitpicking and often only 100% counts.
